May 2001
(This article was written as a kind of business plan for a
new language.
So it is missing (because it takes for granted) the most important
feature of a good programming language: very powerf...
Similar Articles (10 found)
🔍 83.1% similar
May 2001
(These are some notes I made
for a panel discussion on programming language design
at MIT on May 10, 2001.)
1. Programming Languages Are for ...
🔍 82.7% similar
May 2002
"The quantity of meaning compressed into a small space by
algebraic signs, is another circumstance that facilitates
the reasonings we are acc...
🔍 76.3% similar
May 2002
"We were after the C++ programmers. We managed to drag a
lot of them about halfway to Lisp."
- Guy Steele, co-author of the Java spec
|
|
In ...
🔍 75.9% similar
May 2003
(This essay is derived from a guest lecture at Harvard, which incorporated
an earlier talk at Northeastern.)
When I finished grad school in c...
🔍 73.4% similar
April 2003
(This essay is derived from a keynote talk at PyCon 2003.)
It's hard to predict what
life will be like in a hundred years. There are only a...
🔍 72.7% similar
April 2001
This essay developed out of conversations I've had with
several other programmers about why Java smelled suspicious. It's not
a critique of...
🔍 72.3% similar
| |
1993
(This essay is from the introduction to On Lisp.)
It's a long-standing principle of programming style that the functional
elements of a progr...
🔍 72.1% similar
December 2001 (rev. May 2002)
(This article came about in response to some questions on
the LL1 mailing list. It is now
incorporated in Revenge of the...
🔍 71.2% similar
August 2004
In a recent talk I said something that upset a lot of
people: that you could get smarter programmers to work on
a Python project than you ...
🔍 70.1% similar
May 2003
If Lisp is so great, why don't more people use it? I was
asked this question by a student in the audience at a
talk I gave recently. Not for ...